CASE RESULTS

This firm has represented numerous Federal employees in nearly every federal agency imaginable. Mr. Kirkpatrick has conducted several hundred written responses and oral replies on behalf of Federal employees.

March 13, 2025
Client, a grade 15 employee with the federal government, receives a notice of proposed removal. Pursuant to representation, the agency rescinds the proposed removal with no discipline. Client returns to full duty.
February 13, 2025
Client, a police officer the Department of Veterans Affairs, receives a proposed removal for allegations of misconduct. Pursuant to representation, and the administrative process, the agency mitigates the proposed penalty of removal to a small period of suspension. Client returns to full duty.
December 20, 2024
Client, a Special Agent with the US Department of Justice, had his top-secret clearance revoked by the agency. Through representation, client appeals to the Department of Justice Access Review Committee (ARC). The ARC hearing is held that Main Justice in Washington DC. The ARC issues a decision and does not sustain the agency revocation.
November 1, 2024
Client, a police officer the Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, receives a notice of proposed removal for allegations of misconduct. Through representation, client conducts the administrative process with counsel. At the conclusion of the administrative process, the agency rescinds the action. Client returns to full duty with no penalty or discipline. 
October 1, 2024
Client, a police officer with the Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, receives a notice of proposed removal. At the conclusion of the administrative process with the agency, the agency issues a mitigation to a two grade level demotion. Through representation, client files and MSPB appeal challenging the demotion. Through the discovery process prior to the MSPB hearing, the agency agrees to reinstate client at the original grade level. Client returns to full duty with the original grade level of pay.
August 1, 2024
Client, an employee with the United States Department of the Interior, received a proposal for a suspension without pay is accused of lack of candor. Pursuant to representation, the agency rescinds the lack of candor charge and client receives no suspension and returned to full duty.
June 1, 2024
Client, a Special Agent with the US Department of Justice, received a notice of a security clearance revocation. Client placed in an unpaid status. Pursuant to representation, the agency rescinds the notice of security clearance revocation. Client returns to full duty.
April 1, 2024
Client, a law enforcement employee for the US Department of Justice, received a notice of proposed removal for allegations of misconduct. The agency then removed client from federal service. Through representation, client filed an appeal with the MSPB challenging the removal. Pursuant to a full MSPB hearing, the court issued a decision reversing the removal. Client returns to full duty with all benefits pursuant to the back pay act, including back pay, restored leave, and all other available relief. The agency declines to file an appeal. Full attorney’s fees are awarded.
March 1, 2024
Client, a supervisor with the US Department of Labor, receives a proposed notice of removal for allegations of misconduct. Pursuant to representation including a written response and oral reply with the agency deciding official, the agency fully rescinds the proposed removal notice. The employee is provided the opportunity to voluntarily transfer to another office within the US Department of Labor that he chooses.
February 1, 2024
Client, a police officer with the Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, receives a proposal to demote him one grade level for allegations of misconduct. Pursuant to representation during the administrative process including a written response and oral reply, client receives a small suspension and retains is grade level and returns to full duty.
December 1, 2023
Client, receives a notice of proposed removal for allegations of misconduct in addition to a preliminary decision to revoke the client’s security clearance. The client was 18 months away from retirement. Through representation, it was successfully negotiated with the agency to allow the client to a full retirement and not take final action. The client retires with full retirement benefits.
October 1, 2023
Client, a Special Agent with the US Department of Justice, is named as a person of interest for a multi-defendant indictment prosecuted by the Manhattan US Attorney office. Client is represented during several meetings and discussions with federal prosecutors. Client is not charged and does not participate in the case. Client continues full duty with the agency.
Show More